Psalm 51:5 | Misconceptions Part 2

Psalm 51:5...Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, And in sin my mother conceived me.

Wisdom Watchmen Logo - Revealing Truth in a World of Deception Cross Only

Was King David really telling us that he was sinful from his birth?  Is this the context of this infamous passage? This series continues to shed some light on some of the most misinterpreted and misused scriptures in the bible.

Acts 20:25-27…And indeed, now I know that you all, among whom I have gone preaching the kingdom of God, will see my face no more. Therefore, I testify to you this day that I am innocent of the blood of all men. For I have not shunned to declare to you the whole counsel of God.

God’s Word is the ultimate authority for all doctrine and Biblical philosophy (2 Timothy 3:16-17). However, there are so many different denominations, sects, and beliefs within the “Christian” religion. How can different people read the exact same passage of scripture and see two completely different answers? There are many reasons for this, but we will focus on one of the biggest problems with the modern church.

That problem is called “Proof Texting”

 

“Proof Texting” is the practice of using isolated, out-of-context quotations from a document to establish a proposition in eisegesis (introducing one’s own theories, agendas, or biases).
People will take one verse and build an entire belief or doctrine based on that one verse without understanding the context of what is being said. A lot of times without ever reading the entire chapter or letter to understand what is being said and to whom. The other problem with this tactic is that it seemingly creates contradictions in the Bible that aren’t really there. The Word of God is perfect and infallible but without the proper context, it’s easy to misunderstand it.

“And so we have the prophetic word confirmed, which you do well to heed as a light that shines in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts; knowing this first, that no prophecy of Scripture is of any private interpretation, for prophecy never came by the will of man, but holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Spirit.”
(2 Peter 1:19-21)

We are going to bring to light some of the most misused “Proof Texts” in the Bible. We hope to shed some light on the context of each of these scriptures and explain exactly what the writer is trying to say and who they are saying it to. Hopefully this study will open up your eyes to some of the scriptures you’ve probably hear your entire life but never really understood what God is trying to tell us.

“Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, And in sin my mother conceived me…”(Psalm 51:5)

This verse in Psalms is the all-time favorite go to “proof-text” used to support the belief that because of Adam’s sin in the garden, we are all born with a corrupted and sinful nature. This doctrine is referred to as Original Sin and traces its roots back to Gnosticism. It was formally advanced by Augustine in the late fourth century A.D. and was later extrapolated by Calvin in the 1500’s into his own heresy of Total Depravity. Is David actually saying that he was born with an inherited sin-nature in this Psalm? Before answering that question, you may want to consider the background of the verse. (Read More Here about the History of the Doctrine of Original Sin)

The context of this passage was David’s Mother’s sin

This passage was written during a period of intense sorrow and broken repentance after David was confronted by God’s prophet Nathan over his adultery with Bathsheba. The verse certainly bears no obvious connection to the sin of Adam and Eve. Instead, it is quite clear that David’s reference to sin and iniquity is aimed directly at his own mother. Most Christians are surprised to learn that traditional Jewish history holds the view that David was born as the result of an adulterous relationship on the part of his mother Nizbeth.

The Hebrew word normally used for “conceived” throughout Scripture is “harah” (Strong’s H2029) and simply means a woman becoming pregnant. However in this passage, David chose the Hebrew word “yacham” and it is an extremely strong and graphic one. It means the warmth of sexual desire, most often used to denote animals (cattle and sheep) conceiving in heat. (Strong’s H3179) This is the only verse in Scripture where “yacham” is used in reference to a woman becoming pregnant. Not a very pleasant word to use for the woman who birthed you, but it appears that David specifically chose it to convey the image of being conceived in the animal lust of his own mother. The historical tradition of David being illegitimate also finds support in the 69th Psalm. In one passage, David cries out to God:

“I have become a stranger to my brothers, and an alien to my mother’s children…” (Psalm 69:8)

The word translated “stranger” (Strong’s H2114) comes from the same primitive Hebrew root word as “bastard.” (Strong’s H4464) It can also be translated “of another family” especially in regard to unlawful intercourse with an adulteress. This could very well explain why David felt like an alien to his own brothers. The 69th Psalm describes an innocent man who was rejected and considered an outcast. He was scorned and ridiculed by the people of his own community, and shamed and dishonored by those around him. (Psalm 69:11-12) If anything was stolen he was blamed and ordered to restore it. (Psalm 69:4) He was despised by all and pitied by none. He was given gall for food and vinegar for drink. (Psalm 69:19-21)

In 1 Samuel 16:11 it is interesting to note that Jesse did not have David present with his other sons when the prophet Samuel came to anoint the man whom God had chosen to be Israel’s next king. Later in 1 Samuel 17:28, David was publicly rebuked by his own brother, when all he had done was speak out against Goliath in the camp of the Israelites. That this was an established pattern of abuse by his brother is evidenced by David’s response in verse 29, “What have I done now?” These passages paint a picture of David as a young man who was shunned, despised, rejected, and treated with scorn and derision by family and community alike. If you are unfamiliar with the phrase, “Red-headed stepchild,” then Google it, because that is exactly how David was treated.

David was a broken man in a season of Godly Sorrow

David persisted in his innocence declaring that he was hated without cause (Psalm 69:4). History has shown that David was speaking truthfully and that this Jewish historical tradition is indeed a false one, for Matthew 1:6 declares that Jesse begat David the king. However this does not change the fact that these passages strongly suggest that David’s family and community did in fact, believe him to be that red-headed step-child, and they acted accordingly.

When you factor this information into your understanding of Psalm 51:5, you begin to see that this passage has nothing to do with man having a corrupted sinful nature because of Adam’s fall in the garden. David was not lamenting that he was born in sin, but rather that he was born into a sinful world. That is the meaning of the passage.

Why do various versions say something different?

Depending on the Bible version you read, you can get many different variations of this verse. This is a major reason why so many people understand this verse as a “proof text” teaching the doctrine of original sin.  (Read more on the Original Sin doctrine here)

NIV (New International Version) says: Surely I was sinful at birth, sinful from the time my mother conceived me.”

NLT (New Living Translation) says: For I was born a sinner— yes, from the moment my mother conceived me.”

NRS (New Revised Standard) says: Indeed, I was born guilty, a sinner when my mother conceived me.”

The proper translation of this verse is in the KJV (King James Version): “Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity. And in sin my mother conceived me.”

It is very easy to see what the translators belief and agendas were based on their interpretation of this verse.  However, understanding the actual words used along with the historical context of David’s family, the whole idea that David was stating anything about Original Sin is just a fallacy.

Sin is not a disease that we have inherited, it is a choice we make of our own free will

But each one is tempted when he is drawn away by HIS OWN DESIRES and enticed. Then, when desire has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and sin, when it is full-grown, brings forth death. (James 1:14-15)

As this verse demonstrates, an inbred sinful nature does not produce man’s ungodly desires (Read more about the Sin Nature doctrine). Man’s own free will allows ungodly desire to germinate which, in turn, produces sin. At the end of the day, the wrecking ball for the unsound doctrine of Original Sin is the fact that if we were born with an inherited sinful nature, then so was the Lord Jesus Christ:

Therefore, IN ALL THINGS HE HAD TO BE MADE LIKE HIS BRETHERN, that He might be a merciful and faithful High Priest in things pertaining to God, to make propitiation for the sins of the people. (Hebrews 2:17)
Truly, this only I have found: That God made man upright, but they have sough out many schemes (Ecclesiastes 7:29).

If that doesn’t end the argument of Original Sin for someone, then nothing will. We did not inherit a sinful nature because of Adam’s sin. The inherent potential for sin resides in free will, not in flesh and blood. Lost souls will stand in the dock before God naked, ashamed, and without excuse because they will have rejected the salvation that the Lord has provided, and instead will have willfully chosen depravity over holiness.

Written by David Clifton

Edited by Nick Dreyer

The Misconceptions Series